St00pid's checklist for kiddie pr0n

[informant]

From St00pid's k00k-site. And I'm still not Alex, imbecile.

******************
richard
Site Admin


Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 16

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:23 am Post subject:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

I am amazed with you informant, alex.
Here you are giving a description of what is the difference between art and
pornography.
This also applies to child photography as well.

Oh goody. You've reported me to the Wisc. AG.
They'll see this photo and wonder what the fuck is YOUR problem informant.

1) no exposure of private parts.
....a) Nipples/breasts covered.
....b) vagina not exposed.

2) no sexual contact.
3) the pose is not designed to be "lewd or lascivious".

These conditions MUST be met before it is considered pornographic.

So write and bitch to whom ever you want.
Because if the Wisc. AG takes me to court over this, he can be damned sure
that every art musuem in the state will be hauled into court right along
with me.

[informant]

Richard, answer the question already

http://www.richardbullis.com/boards/
Richardbullis.com Forum Index -> Gossip 101

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 11:34 am Post subject: Richard, answer the
question already

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Just give a straight answer. Do pictures of naked children excite you
sexually? I would like an honest answer from you. You said you are brave
enough to stand behind your opinions. Prove to the world that your are.


richard
Site Admin

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:15 pm Post subject:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Act as a responsible adult and I will answer your questions. Be an arse
about it, and I will continue to delete your posts.

No matter how I respond to such a question, you, and others will still have
their own answer and use that regardless.

If you have visited www.lart.com you will quickly see that words are twisted
around to suit his purpose. Even when you see that what I "allegedly" said
is far different that what he claims. You recall what HE said. Because his
statement agrees with yours.

My scenario presented in misc.legal where I said I would take mother and
daughters on a boat ride, then once in international waters rape them, was
purely a fantasy scene to find out what laws people believed would be
violated.
If I had just said, shoot them dead, it would have been forgotten about
quickly. Or if anyone else had presented the same scenario, nobody would
recall it a month later.

Although, informant would have you believe I either have done this, or would
do this, is pure bullshit on his part.

Private thoughts and discussions of fantasy scenes are not yet illegal. If
they ever do become illegal, there would be an extremely high prison
population created over night.

Some Guy
Guest

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:51 pm Post subject:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Ok I will refrain from the name calling etc. I just want a straight answer
from you. That's it. Yes or no. Does looking at pictures of naked children
excite you sexually?


richard
Site Admin

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 10:26 pm Post subject:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Can you read and comprehend?
What difference does it make how I answer?
If I say no, you say, "Liar.".
If I say yes, you say, "Pervert"".

As long as the images are not pornographic, I have no qualms wtih merely
looking at naked children.
Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.

*******************************

Yes, Bullis, you drooling over naked kids and having no qualms about it is
exactly the point, Fukkkhead.

[A. Cain]

Post by informant
Richard, answer the question already
http://www.richardbullis.com/boards/
Richardbullis.com Forum Index -> Gossip 101
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 11:34 am Post subject: Richard, answer the
question already
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

Post by informant
----
Just give a straight answer. Do pictures of naked children excite you
sexually? I would like an honest answer from you. You said you are brave
enough to stand behind your opinions. Prove to the world that your are.
richard
Site Admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

Post by informant
----
Act as a responsible adult and I will answer your questions. Be an arse
about it, and I will continue to delete your posts.
No matter how I respond to such a question, you, and others will still have
their own answer and use that regardless.
If you have visited www.lart.com you will quickly see that words are twisted
around to suit his purpose. Even when you see that what I "allegedly" said
is far different that what he claims. You recall what HE said. Because his
statement agrees with yours.
My scenario presented in misc.legal where I said I would take mother and
daughters on a boat ride, then once in international waters rape them, was
purely a fantasy scene to find out what laws people believed would be
violated.
If I had just said, shoot them dead, it would have been forgotten about
quickly. Or if anyone else had presented the same scenario, nobody would
recall it a month later.
Although, informant would have you believe I either have done this, or would
do this, is pure bullshit on his part.
Private thoughts and discussions of fantasy scenes are not yet illegal. If
they ever do become illegal, there would be an extremely high prison
population created over night.
Some Guy
Guest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

Post by informant
----
Ok I will refrain from the name calling etc. I just want a straight answer
from you. That's it. Yes or no. Does looking at pictures of naked children
excite you sexually?
richard
Site Admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

Post by informant
----
Can you read and comprehend?
What difference does it make how I answer?
If I say no, you say, "Liar.".
If I say yes, you say, "Pervert"".
As long as the images are not pornographic, I have no qualms wtih merely
looking at naked children.
Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.
*******************************
Yes, Bullis, you drooling over naked kids and having no qualms about it is
exactly the point, Fukkkhead.

[Doktor DynaSoar]

Another Richard the St00pid quote for the record:

} I have no qualms wtih merely
} looking at naked children.
} Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.

I see no reason to add anything.

[A. Cain]

Post by Doktor DynaSoar
} I have no qualms wtih merely
} looking at naked children.
} Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.
I see no reason to add anything.

And none is needed.

[informant]

Post by Doktor DynaSoar
} I have no qualms wtih merely
} looking at naked children.
} Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.
I see no reason to add anything.

St00pid better hope his new employers, if they exist, don't surf the net.

[A. Cain]

Post by informant

Post by Doktor DynaSoar
} I have no qualms wtih merely
} looking at naked children.
} Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.
I see no reason to add anything.

St00pid better hope his new employers, if they exist, don't surf the net.

If they did, he'd last about five seconds before getting more "employment
compensation" again.

[informant]

Post by A. Cain

Post by informant

Post by Doktor DynaSoar
} I have no qualms wtih merely
} looking at naked children.
} Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.
I see no reason to add anything.

St00pid better hope his new employers, if they exist, don't surf the net.

If they did, he'd last about five seconds before getting more "employment
compensation" again.

That's not an option for St00pid. UI is based on wages earned over the
previous four quarters. Bullis gets nothing. Livin' Large Larry will be
living small if he continues supporting the deadbeat.

[Wurk]

Post by Doktor DynaSoar
} I have no qualms wtih merely
} looking at naked children.
} Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.
I see no reason to add anything.

Quoth Adolf Hitler:

"I have no qualms wtih merely
looking at naked ...... "

Well, you get the picture.


Hahaha

Wurk

[gadfly-x]

Post by Wurk

Post by Doktor DynaSoar
} I have no qualms wtih merely
} looking at naked children.
} Same as you drooling over that playboy centerfold.
I see no reason to add anything.

"I have no qualms wtih merely
looking at naked ...... "
Well, you get the picture.
Hahaha
Wurk

After so many years of sucking up usenet, your style style constipates all.
You suck.
hyucky hyuckety hyuck
--
Known forces of Evil:
Chas Sockpuppet Army
The Witches
The Pest Horde
Spinics United
The Speilberg Conspiracy
Brandon hex's filthy mouth
Alex Cain's obsession
Allan Connor's illegal cable hookup

[informant]

lost4evermore
Senior member


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 70
Location: not a clue
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:39 am Post subject:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

ER

Perhaps the officer felt the form was not up to date.
I've seen many that were barely readable.
Afterall, they sit for ages, get moved around, and eventually the ink wears
down and smudges.

I got nailed once because the officer couldn't read the FHWA sticker on the
trailer. Even though the company was going by the book.

As for court dates, many times you are not given one unless you request one.
Or, the court date is the date by which the fine is due to be paid.


I got a ticket in Ind. and was not advised by the officer I had to appear in
court. But sent a letter to the court explaining my side. I got a letter
back stating by when the fine had to be paid.

********************************

GUILTY. Archived